Haifa Mexico Trial Report
Description
Crop/Cultivar & Growing method
|
Corn, N83N5 Syngenta
|
Area
|
3 Ha
|
Objectives
|
Assess economic viability and yield in corn using a mix of Cote-N, Urea, MAP, KCl and Micronutrients (29-12-6), the Nitrogen will be 35% coated.
|
Haifa product + formula
|
Cote-(4) 42-0-0
|
Accomplish objectives
|
1. - Determine and compare crop yield with farmer´s fertilization method.
2. - Determine economic viability of using Cote-N in corn compared with farmer´s fertilization method.
|
|
|
Report date:
|
19/02 /2016 (day / month / year)
|
Trial partner (name):
|
Campo Fino, Jalisco.
|
Type of partner’s business:
|
Private grower
|
Address:
|
San Martin Hidalgo, Ameca, Jalisco.
|
Cellular/Telephone:
|
01 (375) 755 8557
|
Email:
|
|
Haifa Staff in charge
|
Ing. Mateo Martinez Nicolas, Technical Representative Mexico Center-West.
|
Methods and Materials
Experimental plan
|
Fully randomly
|
Repetitions
|
|
Treatments
|
T1: Farmer’s method.
Base dressing: 530 Kg/Ha of traditional mix 22-12-16.
Second Application: 100 Kg/Ha of Urea 46-0-0
Third Application: 100 Kg/Ha of Urea 46-0-0
Total Nutrients: 209-64-85 Kg/Ha of N-P-K.
|
T2: Slow release fertilizer aplication.
Base dressing: 400 Kg/Ha of Slow release fertilizer 20-10-10
Second Application: 100 Kg/Ha of Urea 46-0-0
Third Application: 100 Kg/Ha of Urea 46-0-0
Total Nutrients: 172-40-40 Kg/Ha of N-P-K
|
|
T3: Cote-N Mix (Fermix-Corn).145-60-30 70(35-0-0)
Base dressing: Fermix-Corn 29-12-6, 500 Kg/Ha. Single application.
Total Nutrients: 145-60-30 Kg/Ha of N-P-K.
N reduction VS Farmer’s method: 64 Kg/Ha (30.6%)
N reduction VS Treatment 2 (Slow release): 27 Kg/Ha (15.6%).
Multicote Agri (4) 29-12-6(35-0-0)
|
|
Application methods
|
Base dressing / foliar
|
Sowing/Transplanting date
|
June-5-2015
|
Harvest date
|
Nov-19-2015
|
Soil characteristics
|
Clay |
Grower's current fertilization practice
|
Base dressing: 530 Kg/Ha of traditional mix 22-12-16.
Second Application: 100 Kg/Ha of Urea 46-0-0
Third Application: 100 Kg/Ha of Urea 46-0-0
|
Irrigation method
|
None Irrigated.
|
Climate conditions
|
14-28 °C.
|
Statistical analysis method
|
RANDOM
|
Results
General results
|
Crop yield in grain harvested.
T1: Yield = 14.19 Ton/Ha Cost: 460 USD/Ha
T2: Yield = 13.80 Ton/Ha Cost: 442 USD/Ha
T3: Yield = 15.07 Ton/Ha Cost: 365 USDHa
|
Inferior treatment results and costs
|
Treatment 2: Slow release fertilizer.
In this treatment was applied 400 Kg/Ha of slow release fertilizer 20-10-10 and 200 Kg/Ha of Urea 46-0-0. So the final NPK program was 172-40-40. This had a cost of 442 USD/Ha.
The crop yield was 13.80 Ton/Ha.
|
Best treatment results and costs
|
T3 was the best treatment, the fertilization rate was 500 Kg/Ha 29-12-6 (Base dressing): 35% of the Nitrogen was coated with Cote-N 42-0-0 and there was only one application during the all crop season plus 2 foliar sprays with 1). 1 Kg PF 19-19-19+ME, 1 Kg Magnisal/Ha, 2). 1 Kg PF 10-10-43+ME, 1 Kg Magnisal/Ha.
The final program NPK of this treatment was 145-60-30 and this had a cost of 365 USD/Ha and the crop yield was 15.07 ton/Ha.
|
Economical results
|
At the harvest date corn grain was at 200 USD/Ton in the market, so:
T1: Cost = 460 USD/Ha Yield = 14.19 ton/Ha Income = 2,838 USD/Ha Net Income = $ 2,378
T2: Cost = 442 USD/Ha Yield = 13.80 ton/Ha Income = 2,760 USD/Ha Net Income = $ 2,318
T3: Cost = 365 USD/Ha Yield = 15.07 ton/Ha Income = 3,014 USD/Ha Net Income = $2,649
|
Net benefit of the best treatment ($/Ha)
|
The net benefit was 2,649 USD/Ha.
|
Benefit/Cost Ratio
|
|
Conclusions
Summary
|
Using 35 % of Nitrogen as Cote-N in a mix 29-12-6, this farmer decreased the production cost 95 USD/Ha (20%), increased crops yield +0.88 ton/Ha (6.2%) and the net benefit increased 271 USD/Ha compared to his traditional management.
|
Crop potential (Ha)
|
|
Potential for increased consumption
|
100 MT of the mix 29-12-6.
|
Benefit for HCL
|
|
Notes
|
|
Reference
|
|